New 401(k) Rules for 2021, Including Thrift Savings Plan​

A 401(k) is a fabulous tool for savvy retirement savers, and it’s a great idea to get a jump on your retirement contributions early in the new year. With the beginning of 2021 comes a fresh start on a lot of financial things, so be sure you know the 401(k) rules for 2021 in order to make your plans.

A lot about your 401(k) doesn’t have to change at all in 2021, while a few other aspects will adjust somewhat. Know what the rules are regarding 401(k)s for 2021. That will help you plan ahead and figure out the best game plan for your retirement savings.

401(k) Contribution Limits for 2021

The total amount an individual can contribute to their 401(k) in the new year is the same as for 2020. You can put up to $19,500 of your income into a 401(k) account in 2021.

You’d have to save $1,625 each month to be able to reach the maximum contribution amount. In addition, the same goes for most of the retirement plans that are similar to a 401(k). Your 403(b) account, most 457 accounts, and the federal government’s Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) are included. They all come with $19,500 max contribution per person. Please click HERE to learn more.

FedSavvy Educational Solutions takes no responsibility for the current accuracy of this information. Securities offered through J.W. Cole Financial, Inc. (JWC) Member FINRA/SIPC. Advisory Services offered through J.W. Cole Advisors (JWCA). FedSavvy Educational Solutions and JWC/JWCA are unaffiliated entities. Securities are not FDIC insured or guaranteed and may lose value. Investments are not guaranteed and you can lose money. This presentation is for educational purposes only and is not an offer to buy or sell an investment. Neither FedSavvy and JWC/JWCA are tax or legal a

Rebalancing Your Portfolio

Rebalancing Your Portfolio
Everyone loves a winner. If an investment is successful, most people naturally want to stick with it. But is that the best approach?

It may sound counterintuitive, but it may be possible to have too much of a good thing. Over time, the performance of different investments can shift a portfolio’s intent – and its risk profile. It’s a phenomenon sometimes referred to as “risk creep,” and it happens when a portfolio has its risk profile shift over time.

Balancing

When deciding how to allocate investments, many start by taking into account their time horizon, risk tolerance, and specific goals. Next, individual investments are selected that pursue the overall objective. If all the investments selected had the same return, that balance – that allocation – would remain steady for a period of time. But if the investments have varying returns, over time, the portfolio may bear little resemblance to its original allocation.

HOW REBALANCING WORKS
Rebalancing is the process of restoring a portfolio to its original risk profile.

There are two ways to rebalance a portfolio.

The first is to use new money. When adding money to a portfolio, allocate these new funds to those assets or asset classes that have fallen. For example, if bonds have fallen from 40% of a portfolio to 30%, consider purchasing enough bonds to return them to their original 40% allocation. Diversification is an investment principle designed to manage risk. However, diversification does not guarantee against a loss.

The second way of rebalancing is to sell enough of the “winners” to buy more underperforming assets. Ironically, this type of rebalancing actually forces you to buy low and sell high.

Periodically rebalancing your portfolio to match your desired risk tolerance is a sound practice regardless of the market conditions. One approach is to set a specific time each year to schedule an appointment to review your portfolio and determine if adjustments are appropriate.

SHIFTING ALLOCATION
Over time, market conditions can change the risk profile of an investment portfolio. For example, imagine that on January 1, 2010, an investor created a portfolio containing a mix of 50% bonds and 50% stocks. By January 1, 2020, if the portfolio were left untouched, the mix would have changed to 33% bonds and 67% stocks.

Shifting Allocation
Sources: DQYDJ.com, 2020 | TreasuryDirect.gov, 2020. For the period January 1, 2010, to January 1, 2020. Stocks are represented by the S&P 500 Composite index (total return), an unmanaged index that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Bonds are represented by data obtained by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Index performance is not indicative of the past performance of a particular investment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Individuals cannot invest directly in an index. When sold, an investment’s shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Bonds that are redeemed prior to maturity may be worth more or less than their original stated value. The rate of return on investments will vary over time, particularly for longer-term investments. Investments that offer the potential for high returns also carry a high degree of risk. Actual returns will fluctuate. The types of securities and strategies illustrated may not be suitable for everyone.

A New $900 Billion COVID-19 Stimulus Package Passed By Congress Was Signed Into Law By President Trump on December 27, 2020

What’s most important about the legislation is what’s not in it. It does not extend the CARES Act provisions for coronavirus-related distributions (CRDs) beyond December 30, 2020 and does not extend the RMD waiver beyond 2020.

The new law does include retirement plan disaster relief for non-COVID-19 disaster declarations. The relief is the same as the disaster relief we have seen in prior legislation. Individuals affected by a declared disaster can take up to $100,000 of “qualified disaster distributions” annually from IRAs and company plans. The distributions would be exempt from the 10% early distribution penalty, taxable income could be spread ratably over three years, and the distribution could be repaid within three years.

The legislation also includes the same relief for plan loans made on account of a covered disaster that we saw in the CARES Act. The limit for plan loans is doubled to $100,000 (but no more than 100% of the vested account balance). In addition, loan repayments due in the 180-day period after the disaster can be suspended.

The stimulus package also permanently extends the 7.5% threshold for deductible medical expenses. (The SECURE Act had temporarily extended the 7.5% threshold for 2019 and 2020.) This means that the 10% early distribution penalty will not apply to IRA or plan withdrawals for medical expenses to the extent the expenses exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income.

CORONAVIRUS VACCINES AND THE ECONOMY

As the United States sees a rise in cases of COVID-19 across the nation, news of two promising vaccines out of hundreds being tested has offered a ray of hope for a fatigued world.1

A positive reaction to these vaccines affects every aspect of human life, including the financial world. On Monday, November 16th, The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 450 points on the news of a second effective vaccine, hitting a record high.2

Markets are not merely reacting to the positive news, but what a vaccine might mean for the economy. Investors are likely picturing people returning to something resembling their old lives. Stocks related to travel, such as airlines and cruise holidays, have seen an uptick. The properties of the vaccine itself might influence the markets – one of the vaccines spotlighted requires deep refrigeration, leading to a boost in trading for companies offering that service.3

While the hope the vaccine inspires feels reassuring, it’s crucial to maintain the long view, just as the markets are. Investors may now see life after COVID-19 on the horizon, but we aren’t there yet. Vaccines must be approved for use, distributed, and widely adopted before the full benefit can be realized. That will take time.4

1. The Associated Press, November 16, 2020

2. CNBC.com, November 16, 2020

3. Barrons.com, November 10, 2020

4. Seattle Times, November 16, 2020

The TSP’s New Spillover Methodology for 2021

Beginning with the first full pay period of 2021, the TSP is dramatically changing the way that it processes Catch-Up contributions. The new method includes both Civilian and Uniformed Services participants. If you are paid by the National Finance Center, the spillover methodology will be effective PP26, as that’s the pay period associated with the first pay date in 2021.

Let’s start by talking about what’s not changing. If you will be under age 50 by December 31, 2021, then you will not be immediately impacted by this change because you will not be eligible to make Catch-Up contributions in 2021. Your relationship with the TSP is the same for now, and when you hit your 50th year of birth, you will become eligible for Catch-Up contributions and will follow the new spillover methodology described below.

The analysis here is based upon the following TSP Bulletins:

TSP Bulletin 19-5

TSP Bulletin 20-1

I believe following analysis to be accurate, but I defer to the TSP bulletins above and the TSP itself as the final word on the implementation of the new spillover methodology.

For you folks that are not yet eligible for Catch-Up contributions, I again urge you to stop using a percentage of your pay as a basis for making a TSP contribution. Please use a stated dollar amount. Don’t use 15% of your pay, for example, see what that is in dollars by looking at your payroll statement and switch to that dollar amount. If it’s under $750 per pay period, then start increasing your TSP contribution every pay period, even if only by $5 a pay period. Have a plan to max out the allowable contribution. The only folks that should be using a percentage basis for their contribution are folks that are just looking for the full government match on the first 5% of contributions. These are usually folks that are just starting out or folks that are saving through a spouse’s plan or a non-employer plan.

The new spillover methodology discussed in the following paragraphs still does not fix the issue of reaching the maximum deferral amount before year end. If you are making $170,300 per year, or $6,550 per pay period, and you elect to contribute 15% to the TSP, that’s a contribution of $983 per pay period. If you contribute $983 for 26 pay periods, that’s $25,558 annually, well above the 2021 limit of $19,500. If you were to make this mistake in 2021, at $983 per pay period, you’d hit the maximum TSP contribution of $19,500 after 20 pay periods (19.84 pay periods, but rounding to 20.) That means that you will miss out on your 4% matching for 6 pay periods, so that’s $6,550 x 4% x 6 = $1,572 in missed matching from the government because you were using a percentage multiplier that was too large. If you want to max out the TSP contribution, do not play games with percentages – just elect $750 per pay period. It’s as simple as that. I get the emails – this happens quite frequently to folks that are using percentages.

For you folks that are eligible for Catch-Up contributions, here’s my analysis of what has changed and how to properly participate in the TSP to get the full benefits of your Regular and Catch-Up contributions. The biggest change is that there is no longer any separate election form or process to elect Catch-Up contributions. The TSP-1-C form has been discontinued. TSP Participants will now just elect an amount per pay period to contribute (percentage or dollars, but I encourage dollars.)

As a refresher, remember that Regular contributions are tax-deferred or tax-advantaged (Roth) and the first 5% you contribute per pay period is matched with 4% by the government. You also receive a 1% automatic contribution from the government, even if you make no TSP contributions, so that’s why it looks like the government matches 5% with 5%, but they are matching 5% with 4% and giving you 1% for having a pulse.

With the new method, it’s even more important to get away from using percentages as a contribution base. The new methodology still will not solve the issue discussed in the section above for folks that are not yet eligible to make Catch-Up contributions. Even with spillover, if you contribute too much, too soon, you can still miss out on matching. Let’s use the same $170,300 per year, which is $6,550 per pay period, but now let’s say the contribution rate was set to 20%. At 20%, that’s a contribution of $1,310 per pay period and $34,060 annually. Even with spillover, this person will have hit the combined maximum deferral of $26,000 in the same 20 pay periods (really 19.84, but I am rounding.) As you can clearly see, spillover does not fix this. You will miss out on the same $1,572 of matching contributions from the government.

Let’s first examine what happens when an employee gets it right. The maximum deferral for 2021 is $26,000 ($19,500 Regular + $6,500 Catch-Up = $26,000) and we have 26 pay periods in 2021 at the NFC. Can it be any easier? This smart person logs into the Employee Personal Page and elects to have $1,000 contributed per pay period to fully fund the maximum deferral. Here’s how the TSP will handle and classify this contribution scheme:​

See how the TSP applies the contribution to the Regular first, and then to the Catch-Up Contribution. No match is lost.

Now, let’s see how the TSP will handle the situation described earlier where the employee errantly has $1,310 per pay period deducted:

As you can see, this person really screwed up. The TSP will apply the $1,310 contribution first to the Regular Contribution until the maximum deferral of $19,500 is reached. After that, all contributions are directed as Catch-Up contributions until that maximum deferral of $6,500 is reached. The extra $200 from pay period 19 is returned to the employing agency for further refund to the employee. This person misses out on $1,572 of matching for the remainder of the year  because they didn’t listen. Stop using percentages as a contribution basis for your TSP contributions.

I’ve already had a number of people ask me about what to do if they are planning to retire on a date other than December 31. What about a person that plans to retire on June 30? How can that person ensure that they reach the maximum deferral of $26,000 by the end of pay period 13 at the NFC? That’s easy – $26,000 divided by 14 pay periods is approximately $1,858 per pay period. The chart below demonstrates how the TSP will allocate that $1,858 contribution for 14 pay periods:

Very clean as you can see. Both goals achieved – the Regular Contribution of $19,500 has been met and the Catch-Up Contribution of $6,500 has been met. By rounding up pennies, this person contributed an extra $12 that will be returned by the TSP to the employee’s payroll center for credit back to the employee. Pre-spillover, the TSP would have returned the entire contribution for pay period 13, as that contribution put this person over the deferral limit. Under spillover, the TSP is allowed to accept the contribution up to the maximum deferral limit and just return the overage.

Now, for the next example. Let’s examine what happens when you put no effort into your future and just “guess” at what you should do, and then take corrective actions at the end of the year to remedy the situation. This person just “picks” $800 per pay period as the contribution amount and by pay period 19, this person realizes by talking to his friends that are FERSGUIDE subscribers that he’s on the wrong path. In a panic, this person jumps to $1,200 per pay period for 3 pay periods, then this person becomes a FERSGUIDE member, and emails me for help. This person then adjusts their TSP contribution to $2,200 for the final three pay periods of 2021 and ends up just where they want to be – a full $26,000 deferral and no missed matching. See the chart below.

For the final example, let’s see how hard it is to “frontload” the TSP contribution. I have a number of subscribers that tell me that they like to frontload the TSP Catch-Up contributions and would elect to contribute $1,083 per pay period for 6 pay periods ($6,500) and get their Catch-Up contributions into the TSP quickly, so it can go to work for them sooner. That’s one way to look at it – but I prefer dollar cost averaging and spacing it all out evenly, but so many folks currently frontload that I want to demonstrate how to do that. In this example the employee contributes $2,824 per pay period for 7 pay periods and then submits a new election for $328 per pay period for the remaining 19 pay periods.

That is how you frontload under the spillover method. We have achieved our goal of hitting the maximum deferral of $26,000 and did not miss out on any matching because pay periods 7-25 have a contribution of $328, which is 5% of $6,550, giving us the 4% match of $262.

Dan Jamison, CPA. If you are not a FERSGUIDE member and found this information useful, consider subscribing at www.fersguide.com   

FedSavvy Educational Solutions takes no responsibility for the current accuracy of this information. Securities offered through J.W. Cole Financial, Inc. (JWC) Member FINRA/SIPC. Advisory Services offered through J.W. Cole Advisors (JWCA). FedSavvy Educational Solutions and JWC/JWCA are unaffiliated entities. Securities are not FDIC insured or guaranteed and may lose value. Investments are not guaranteed and you can lose money. This presentation is for educational purposes only and is not an offer to buy or sell an investment. Neither FedSavvy and JWC/JWCA are tax or legal advisors and this information should not be considered tax or legal advice. Consult with a tax and/or legal advisor for such issues.